Skip to main content

Czech names project update: data entry, part 1

 Figured I might as well actually keep notes on what progress I'm making on this project! As a recap, I'm working on pulling the names out of various data sources for 14th-16th century Czechia, categorizing them by year and by gender, and looking for patterns both in the formation of the bynames and in the construction of the names as a whole.

The first source I'm working with is Marta Štefková's Antroponyma v urbářích z 15.–17. století (Proper Names in Urbars of the 15th–17th centuries, https://is.muni.cz/th/u1ye5/). This paper includes an index of names, with the full list of names from each year of her data (1483, 1581, and 1695); focusing on SCA period means I don't care about the names from 1695 and would prefer to exclude them from my own data. Since I want to do my own analysis of these names, and this sort of data works best in spreadsheets, I started by copying Štefková's list of names from 1483 and 1581 into my own spreadsheet.

Each year in Štefková's index is also broken down by the categories she sees them as falling into, her descriptions of which I've summarized as follows:

1 Single occupational descriptor without other personal name
2 Single personal name (given or byname) without other differentiation - even in the same town
3 Given + occupation
3.1 Given + locative (uncommon in these sources because they're already sorted by location)
3.2 Given + occupation + locative
3.3 Given + relational byname - including relatively unmarked ones, and more distant than immediate family
3.4 Given + descriptive (age)
3.5 Given + relational + descriptive
4 Given + surname (type/origin unclear; may even be inherited)
4.1 Given + ?genitive surname? possible relational byname?
4.2 Given + surname + occupation
4.3 Given + surname + locative
4.4 Given + surname + occupation + locative
4.5 Given + surname + descriptive (age)
5 Given + surname + surname - first byname potentially inherited, second potentially from a nickname

I may or may not decide to keep these categories, as I get more data, but it's as good a start as any. Some numbers for how many names are in each category by year:

Category14831581
1430
256811
34240
3.122
3.215
3.3413
3.401
3.501
468266
4.13132
4.2116
4.302
4.401
4.501
511

I'm not ready to do a real analysis of this yet, but it's interesting to just take a quick look at the places where there are huge discrepancies and where they're basically the same, and to consider how much of that is changes in naming practices as opposed to quirks of the type of source we're looking at (since these are generally records for a single town, there aren't as many locatives as I'd expect, for example).

Next up is to do the same for the names in Eva Vepřeková's Edice Nejstarší městské knihy litovelské (The Oldest Edition of the Register of Litovel, https://is.muni.cz/th/z03m5/).

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

April Fools heraldic shenanigans

It is the custom of the SCA College of Arms to create and publish Letters of Misintent on April 1, rather than the more usual Letters of Intent, full of shenanigans of some type or another. Much of the time these are filled with pop culture references made documentable to SCA period by means primarily of the FamilySearch records and the fact that late 16th-century English surnames were often found used as given names as well, but there are occasionally other types of shenanigans, though those are generally funnier to heralds than to layfolk. This is the second year I've been the East Kingdom's submissions herald and therefore nominally in charge of deciding on a theme (or lack thereof) for the April 1 letter, creating it, and publishing it. Last year, everything was Very Too Much and I didn't get around to it; this year, I was determined not to let it pass me by, as I'm stepping down this summer and I wanted to have at least one with my name on it. Behold, the East'...
Post a Comment
Read more

DMNES off-label use: Generating lists of names by culture

The Dictionary of Medieval Names from European Sources (DMNES) is one of my very favorite sources for documenting SCA names, but it can be hard to navigate, and it doesn’t have an easy built-in interface for just browsing names by culture. This is unfortunate, given that one of the ways a lot of names heralds like to handle consults is to hand your submitter a list of names to see if any of them stand out. Just because it doesn’t have an easily browsable interface, though, doesn’t mean it’s not possible to use it to generate lists of names by culture! I stumbled on this awhile back, and figured I’d write up a quick how-to. Fundamentally, this hinges on the fact that the sources for each name in the DMNES are meticulously cited, and that citation is bidirectional: not only is there a link to the source in each individual name’s citation, but each source text has links to every single name that’s listed from that source. The trick is getting the link to each source for your target cu...
Post a Comment
Read more

On the SCA A&S community and motivational barriers

A friend of mine posted a thread today asking people about motivation in the A&S community, and how students tend to feel unmotivated when they can't reach their goal. The question posed was whether there are things in SCA A&S that people find to be motivational barriers, and if so, what is it that stops people from believing that they can do the thing — and what can we do to help. Never one to answer the question as posed, when instead I can answer the question I see as fundamentally underlying one's assumptions, I wrote a series of comments getting up on my soapbox about SCA A&S, and what the goals are, and where the barriers are, with the intention of getting other people to consider the overall framework they're working in. I saw the discussion up to that point as addressing symptoms, but not the root cause, and figured I might as well take a stab at getting to the root of it. Here's an edited version of where I went with that. tl;dr: We're not doin...
3 comments
Read more